Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV gagne (4,42 s vs 5,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 SUV | X5 xDrive40i F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−1,00 s | 5,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s−0,95 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s−1,62 s | 25,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+7 km/h | 243 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,06 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 SUV | X5 xDrive40i F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 5,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 7,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 12,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 22,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 25,12 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 243 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 060 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 5.42 s for the Bmw X5 xDrive40i. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 1.00 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 134 km/h for the Bmw X5 xDrive40i. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 13.71 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 43 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 SUV finishes in 23.50 s versus 25.11 s, with a 1.61 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 243 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ5 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X5 xDrive40i at 243 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 6.06 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.44 seconds. The 1.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV gagne (4,42 s vs 5,42 s).
SQ5 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ5 SUV : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. X5 xDrive40i F15 : 340 hp, ratio 6,06 kg/hp.
SQ5 SUV : 250 km/h. X5 xDrive40i F15 : 243 km/h.