Among the 19 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive40i ranks 14th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (5.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 14th of 19 in Top speed (243 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe), 15th of 19 in Power-to-weight (165 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
F15 · GENERATION 2018 → · LARGE SUV
BMWICE
X5 xDrive40i
340 hp, 5,5 s 0-100 : among the 19 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive40i ranks 14th of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 14th of 19 in Top speed, 15th of 19 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.5s
VMax 243 km/h
Cons.
8.7L
/100 km
Tank
83L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X5 xDrive40i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,998 cm³ |
| Power | 340 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 8.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 83 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,5 s |
| VMax | 243 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,922 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,745 mm |
| Boot | 650 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,060 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 197 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 19 E-SUV, the X5 xDrive40i ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.5 s 0-100 (14th of 19 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X5 xDrive40i ranks 14th of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 1.7 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (3.8 s).
Top speed: 243 km/h (14th of 19 in Top speed)
Top speed of 243 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X5 xDrive40i stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 19 E-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h14e / 19
5,5 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Top speed14e / 19
243 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Power-to-weight15e / 19
165 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 255 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q8 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Cayenne340 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X5 F15 range
Generation F15 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F15
Compare
Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive40i
Frequently asked questions
BMW X5 xDrive40i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 5.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 xDrive40i vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.