Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 4,37 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | A110 S 292 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 3,93 s+0,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,09 s+0,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 22,16 s+1,13 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 264 km/h−34 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hp | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | A110 S 292 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,09 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,83 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 3,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 3,93 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 5,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 8,57 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | 13,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 22,16 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 296 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 S 292 hits 100 km/h in 3.93 s versus 4.37 s for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. Despite lacking instant torque, 296 hp of power compensates. At this point, the A110 S 292 leads by 0.44 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 S 292 is doing 154 km/h against 144 km/h for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.34 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 S 292 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 S 292 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 210 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 S 292 finishes in 22.15 s versus 23.29 s, with a 1.13 s lead.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the SQ6 SUV e-tron never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.73 seconds. The 0.44 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 4,37 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. A110 S 292: 296 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. A110 S 292: 264 km/h.