Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,63 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ6 SUV e-tron | F-TYPE P300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 5.63 s | 1.26 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 13.69 s | 0.99 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 24.35 s | 1.06 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 250 km/h | 20 km/h · F-TYPE P300 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.76 kg/hp | 5.32 kg/hp | better ratio · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ6 SUV e-tron | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.16 s | 1.61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 2.69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.21 s | 4.30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 5.63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.84 s | 7.17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.17 s | 11.54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.87 s | 18.21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 13.69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 24.35 s |
| Top speed limited | 230 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 5.63 s for the F-TYPE P300. The instant torque of 855 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 1.26 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.91 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 13.69 s. The 0.99 s gap represents roughly 47 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 24.35 s, with a 1.06 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), the F-TYPE P300 never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the F-TYPE P300 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.14 seconds. The 1.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,63 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h.