Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,72 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | Model 3 Long Range RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−1,35 s | 5,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s−1,46 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s−2,99 s | 26,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+6 km/h | 224 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,71 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | Model 3 Long Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,51 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 2,52 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 4,19 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 5,72 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 7,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 14,66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | 29,94 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 26,28 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 224 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 446 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 5.72 s for the Model 3 Long Range RWD. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 1.35 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 131 km/h for the Model 3 Long Range RWD. The gap is 0.96 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 14.16 s. The 1.46 s gap represents roughly 63 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 26.28 s, with a 2.99 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 224 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the Model 3 Long Range RWD at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 6.71 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.03 seconds. The 1.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 5,72 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range RWD: 258 hp, ratio 6,71 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. Model 3 Long Range RWD: 224 km/h.