Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | RAV4 PHEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−1,71 s | 6,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s−1,63 s | 14,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s−2,62 s | 25,91 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 264 km/h−34 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,50 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | RAV4 PHEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,58 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 2,57 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 4,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 6,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 8,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 13,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | 23,37 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 14,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 25,91 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp | Inline-4 A25A-FXS (Dynamic Force, Atkinson cycle) |
| Torque | 389 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 990 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Hybrid Synergy Drive) |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 6.08 s for the RAV4 PHEV. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 1.71 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 129 km/h for the RAV4 PHEV. The gap is 1.18 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 14.33 s. The 1.63 s gap represents roughly 72 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 181 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 25.91 s, with a 2.62 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (264 km/h), the RAV4 PHEV never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the SQ6 SUV e-tron never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 6.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.59 seconds. The 1.71 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 6,08 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. RAV4 PHEV: 306 hp, ratio 6,50 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. RAV4 PHEV: 264 km/h.