Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 6,80 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | Cooper S FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s−0,53 s | 6,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s−0,43 s | 14,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−0,53 s | 26,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,78 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | Cooper S FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 2,00 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,76 s | 5,35 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s | 6,80 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,20 s | 8,78 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,63 s | 14,27 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,97 s | 24,25 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s | 14,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 26,40 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 128ti | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 6.80 s for the Cooper S FWD. At this point, the Bmw 128ti leads by 0.53 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 131 km/h for the Cooper S FWD. The gap is 0.38 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 14.86 s. The 0.43 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 183 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.86 s versus 26.40 s, with a 0.53 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 128ti never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 5.78 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.88 seconds. The 0.53 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 6,80 s).
128ti F40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,27 secondes (simulation calibrée).
128ti F40 : 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. Cooper S FWD : 192 hp, ratio 5,78 kg/hp.
128ti F40 : 250 km/h. Cooper S FWD : 240 km/h.