Among the 10 city cars 2017–2021, the Cooper S FWD ranks 7th of 8 in Combined consumption (6.5 L/100, behind the Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT), 4th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).
2019 · GENERATION 2019 → · CITY CAR
MINIICE
Cooper S FWD
192 hp, 6,7 s 0-100 : among the 10 city cars 2017–2021, the Cooper S FWD ranks 7th of 8 in Combined consumption, 4th of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
192hp
280 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.7s
VMax 235 km/h
Cons.
6.5L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications MINI Cooper S FWD
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 192 hp |
| Couple | 280 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.5 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,7 s |
| VMax | 235 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,728 mm |
| Height | 1,432 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,110 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 10 city cars, the Cooper S FWD ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
city car among the best in segment: 4th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT (1st with 5.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris (1st with 5.5 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.5 L/100 L/100 (7th of 8 in Combined consumption)
The Cooper S FWD consumes 6.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT (5.2 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cooper S FWD stands against city cars
Comparison across 10 city cars marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption7e / 8
6.5 L/100
Min 7.1 L/100 · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 5.2 L/100 · Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT
0–100 km/h4e / 10
6,7 s
Min 13,1 s · Hyundai i20 1.2 MPiMax 5,5 s · Toyota GR Yaris
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Clio 3 RS 200200 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
Clio 4 RS 200200 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Polo GTI207 hp · 0-100 6.5 s
208 GTi 30th 208208 hp · 0-100 6.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full MINI Cooper S range
Other versions
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cooper S FWD
Frequently asked questions
MINI Cooper S FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT leads in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100 vs 6.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cooper S FWD vs Opel Corsa F 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.