Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 7,03 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | Clio 3 RS 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s−0,76 s | 7,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s−0,76 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−1,36 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+27 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,20 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,14 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,76 s | 5,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,20 s | 9,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,63 s | 16,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,97 s | 27,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 7.03 s for the Clio 3 RS 200. At this point, the Bmw 128ti leads by 0.76 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 125 km/h for the Clio 3 RS 200. The gap is 0.52 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 15.20 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.86 s versus 27.23 s, with a 1.36 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.83 seconds. The 0.76 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 7,03 s).
128ti F40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,27 seconds (calibrated simulation).
128ti F40: 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200: 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
128ti F40: 250 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200: 223 km/h.