Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 6,63 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 128ti F40 | Clio 4 RS 200 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.27 s | 6.63 s | 0.36 s · 128ti F40 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.44 s | 14.74 s | 0.30 s · 128ti F40 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 26.79 s | 0.92 s · 128ti F40 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 227 km/h | 23 km/h · 128ti F40 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.45 kg/hp | 6.22 kg/hp | better ratio · 128ti F40 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 128ti F40 | Clio 4 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.81 s | 1.63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.01 s | 2.74 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.76 s | 4.66 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.27 s | 6.63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.20 s | 8.72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.63 s | 15.28 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22.97 s | 28.70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.44 s | 14.74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 26.79 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 227 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
Off the line, the 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 6.63 s for the Clio 4 RS 200. Despite the faster sprint time, the Clio 4 RS 200 is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 126 km/h for the Clio 4 RS 200. The gap is 0.05 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 14.74 s. The 0.30 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 128ti finishes in 25.86 s versus 26.78 s, with a 0.92 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 4 RS 200 at 227 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 0.36 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,27 s vs 6,63 s).
128ti F40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,27 seconds (calibrated simulation).
128ti F40: 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. Clio 4 RS 200: 200 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp.
128ti F40: 250 km/h. Clio 4 RS 200: 227 km/h.