Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper S FWD gagne (6,56 s vs 6,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cooper S FWD | Clio 4 RS 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,56 s−0,07 s | 6,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,62 s−0,12 s | 14,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,03 s−0,76 s | 26,79 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+23 km/h | 227 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,86 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,22 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cooper S FWD | Clio 4 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,14 s | 2,74 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,99 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,56 s | 6,63 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,41 s | 8,72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,79 s | 15,28 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,98 s | 28,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,62 s | 14,74 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,03 s | 26,79 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 227 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 195 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
Off the line, the Cooper S FWD hits 100 km/h in 6.56 s versus 6.63 s for the Clio 4 RS 200. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Clio 4 RS 200 is doing 126 km/h against 132 km/h for the Cooper S FWD. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper S FWD crosses the line in 14.62 s versus 14.74 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Cooper S FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cooper S FWD finishes in 26.02 s versus 26.78 s, with a 0.76 s lead.
Electronically capped at 227 km/h, the Clio 4 RS 200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.86 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper S FWD gagne (6,56 s vs 6,63 s).
Cooper S FWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,56 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cooper S FWD : 204 hp, ratio 5,86 kg/hp. Clio 4 RS 200 : 200 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp.
Cooper S FWD : 250 km/h. Clio 4 RS 200 : 227 km/h.