Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,22 s vs 7,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | 320e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s−1,24 s | 7,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s−1,13 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s−3,39 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+35 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,14 s | 2,37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,86 s | 4,96 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,95 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,77 s | 20,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,72 s | 46,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.22 s versus 7.46 s for the Bmw 320e. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 320e is 8 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 136 km/h against 115 km/h for the Bmw 320e. The gap is 0.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.31 s versus 15.43 s. The 1.13 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.37 s versus 28.77 s, with a 3.39 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 1.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 wins (6,22 s vs 7,46 s).
128ti F40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,22 seconds (calibrated simulation).
128ti F40: 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
128ti F40: 250 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.