Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 and 530e iPerformance G30 are neck and neck (6,22 s vs 6,28 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | 530e iPerformance G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s−0,06 s | 6,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s−0,09 s | 14,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s−0,93 s | 26,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,02 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | 530e iPerformance G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,14 s | 2,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,86 s | 4,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s | 6,28 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,95 s | 8,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,77 s | 14,95 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,72 s | 26,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s | 14,40 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s | 26,31 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 770 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.22 s versus 6.28 s for the Bmw 530e iPerformance. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 530e iPerformance is doing 127 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw 128ti. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.31 s versus 14.39 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.37 s versus 26.31 s, with a 0.93 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 530e iPerformance at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.82 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 and 530e iPerformance G30 are neck and neck (6,22 s vs 6,28 s, no significant gap).
128ti F40 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,22 seconds (calibrated simulation).
128ti F40: 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. 530e iPerformance G30: 252 hp, ratio 7,02 kg/hp.
128ti F40: 250 km/h. 530e iPerformance G30: 235 km/h.