Sur 0–100 km/h, 812 GTS gagne (3,15 s vs 10,13 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 GTS | 216d Gran Coupe F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,15 s−6,98 s | 10,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,66 s−6,60 s | 17,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,25 s−12,49 s | 31,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h+127 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,04 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 GTS | 216d Gran Coupe F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,92 s | 1,99 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 3,40 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,47 s | 6,81 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,15 s | 10,13 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 14,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,94 s | 29,18 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,89 s | 93,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,66 s | 17,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,25 s | 31,74 s |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 812 GTS | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 430 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 216d Gran Coupe | |
| Gearbox | Seven-speed Steptronic dual-clutch transmission |
Off the line, the 812 GTS hits 100 km/h in 3.15 s versus 10.13 s for the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe. At this point, the 812 GTS leads by 6.98 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 GTS is doing 178 km/h against 105 km/h for the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe. The gap is 4.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 GTS crosses the line in 10.66 s versus 17.26 s. The 6.60 s gap represents roughly 215 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 812 GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 245 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 GTS finishes in 19.24 s versus 31.73 s, with a 12.49 s lead.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.04 kg/hp vs 12.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.28 seconds. The 6.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 812 GTS gagne (3,15 s vs 10,13 s).
812 GTS passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,15 secondes (simulation calibrée).
812 GTS : 799 hp, ratio 2,04 kg/hp. 216d Gran Coupe F44 : 116 hp, ratio 12,33 kg/hp.
812 GTS : 327 km/h. 216d Gran Coupe F44 : 200 km/h.