Ferrari 812 GTS
799 hp, 3,1 s 0-100 : among the 39 S 2018–2022, the 812 GTS ranks 6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 39 in Top speed, 3rd of 39 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador SVJ. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 799 hp
- 718 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3.1 s
- VMax 340 km/h
- Cons.
- 14.9 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 92 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Power
- 799 hp
- Couple
- 718 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 14.9 L/100 km
- Tank
- 92 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3,1 s
- VMax
- 340 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Width
- 1,971 mm
- Height
- 1,276 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,630 kg
- Cd
- 0.297
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 39 S, the 812 GTS ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 2nd of 39 in Top speed (340 km/h), 3rd of 39 in Power-to-weight (490 hp/t). 6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 2nd of 39 in Top speed (340 km/h), 3rd of 39 in Power-to-weight (490 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 2.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.1 s 0-100 (6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 812 GTS ranks 6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h, 0.3 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (2.8 s).
Top speed: 340 km/h (2nd of 39 in Top speed)
Top speed of 340 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 812 GTS stands against S
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Ferrari 812 812 range
Generation 812 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 812
Popular duels involving the 812 GTS
Continue with the Ferrari 812 GTS
The same car, from other angles.
Ferrari 812 GTS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 812 GTS rank in its segment?
Among the 39 S 2018–2022, the 812 GTS ranks 6th of 39 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 2nd of 39 in Top speed (340 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 3rd of 39 in Power-to-weight (490 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ).
How much does the 812 GTS cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Lamborghini Aventador SVJ instead?
The Lamborghini Aventador SVJ leads in 0–100 km/h (2.8 s vs 3.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 812 GTS vs Lamborghini Aventador SVJ duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.