Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 313 2WD | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−0,83 s | 6,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−0,75 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s−1,28 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 240 km/h−60 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,11 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 313 2WD | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,74 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,65 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,72 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,20 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.83 s for the Bmw 320d. The instant torque of 360 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 320d is 7 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 120 km/h for the Bmw 320d. The gap is 0.16 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.95 s. The 0.75 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 313 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 313 2WD finishes in 26.31 s versus 27.60 s, with a 1.28 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (240 km/h), the Bmw 320d never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.30 seconds. The 0.83 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 6,83 s).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. 320d G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. 320d G20: 240 km/h.