Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and Model 3 RWD are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,00 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Seal 313 2WD | Model 3 RWD | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.00 s | 6.00 s | Same |
| 400 m standing start | 14.21 s | 14.23 s | 0.02 s · Seal 313 2WD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.32 s | 25.66 s | 0.66 s · Model 3 RWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 201 km/h | 21 km/h · Model 3 RWD |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.35 kg/hp | 6.21 kg/hp | better ratio · Model 3 RWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Seal 313 2WD | Model 3 RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.74 s | 1.65 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.90 s | 2.76 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.66 s | 4.49 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.00 s | 6.00 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.72 s | 7.92 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.20 s | 13.46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 22.08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.21 s · tight gap | 14.23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.32 s | 25.66 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 201 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 282 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 461 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 752 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.00 s for the Model 3 RWD. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 RWD is doing 133 km/h against 135 km/h for the Seal 313 2WD. The gap is 0.04 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.23 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the Model 3 RWD keeps accelerating towards 201 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.03 s.
Around 639 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Model 3 RWD overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 21 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 RWD finishes in 25.66 s versus 26.31 s. The 0.65 s delta in favour of the Model 3 RWD shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Model 3 RWD at 201 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.35 kg/hp vs 6.21 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.08 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD and Model 3 RWD are neck and neck (6,00 s vs 6,00 s, no significant gap).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. Model 3 RWD: 282 hp, ratio 6,21 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. Model 3 RWD: 201 km/h.