Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d Touring G20 gagne (6,97 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 6,97 s+1,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,05 s+1,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 27,94 s+1,45 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 230 km/h−50 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 2,20 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 4,69 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 6,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 9,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 18,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 36,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | 2 |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | — |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 320d Touring | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d Touring hits 100 km/h in 6.97 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the Bmw 320d Touring leads by 1.26 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring is doing 118 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 0.91 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d Touring crosses the line in 15.05 s versus 16.10 s. The 1.05 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 163 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring finishes in 27.93 s versus 29.39 s, with a 1.45 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 320d Touring at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (auto vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 1.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d Touring G20 gagne (6,97 s vs 8,23 s).
XC40 B4 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,23 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
XC40 B4 : 180 km/h. 320d Touring G20 : 230 km/h.