BMW 320d Touring

Gazole mild-hybridsaloonGENERATION G20, 2021

190 hp, 7,1 s 0-100 : among the 21 saloons hybrid 2019–2023, the 320d Touring ranks 4th of 21 in Combined consumption, 16th of 20 in Tank range, 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
190 hp
400 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.1 s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
4.5 L
/100 km
Tank
40 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement
1,995 cm³
Electric power
11 hp
Combined power
190 hp
Couple
400 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
4.5 L/100 km
Tank
40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,1 s
VMax
230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,709 mm
Wheelbase
2,851 mm
Width
1,827 mm
Height
1,440 mm
Boot
500 L
Kerb weight
1,630 kg
Cd
0.27
CO₂ WLTP
118 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 21 saloons hybrid, the 320d Touring ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 4th of 21 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 330d (1st with 1255 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 21 in Combined consumption)

The 320d Touring consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 320d (4.1 L/100).

Tank range: 889 km (16th of 20 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320d Touring covers 889 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1255 km.

Where the 320d Touring stands against saloons hybrid

Comparison across 21 saloons hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption4e / 21
4.5 L/100
Min 8 L/100 · BMW M440i Gran CoupéMax 4.1 L/100 · BMW 320d
Tank range16e / 20
889 km
Min 738 km · BMW M440i Gran CoupéMax 1 255 km · BMW 330d
0–100 km/h19e / 21
7,1 s
Min 8,9 s · BMW 318d TouringMax 4,4 s · BMW M340i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Popular duels involving the 320d Touring

Continue with the BMW 320d Touring

The same car, from other angles.

BMW 320d Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 320d Touring rank in its segment?

Among the 21 saloons hybrid 2019–2023, the 320d Touring ranks 4th of 21 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the BMW 320d), 16th of 20 in Tank range (889 km, behind the BMW 330d), 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (7.1 s, behind the BMW M340i xDrive).

What is the range of the 320d Touring?

889 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 16th of 20 in Tank range.

How much does the 320d Touring cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW 320d instead?

The BMW 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d Touring vs BMW 320d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.