Sur 0–100 km/h, 530i G30 gagne (6,47 s vs 6,97 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 530i G30 | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s−0,50 s | 6,97 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,61 s−0,44 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,10 s−1,84 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 530i G30 | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,77 s | 1,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,94 s | 2,20 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,83 s | 4,69 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s | 6,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,55 s | 9,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,25 s | 18,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,22 s | 36,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,61 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,10 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 625 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 320d Touring | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 530i hits 100 km/h in 6.47 s versus 6.97 s for the Bmw 320d Touring. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 320d Touring is 9 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring is doing 118 km/h against 130 km/h for the Bmw 530i. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 530i crosses the line in 14.61 s versus 15.05 s. The 0.44 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 530i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 183 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530i finishes in 26.09 s versus 27.93 s, with a 1.84 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 530i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 320d Touring at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.45 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.70 seconds. The 0.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 530i G30 gagne (6,47 s vs 6,97 s).
530i G30 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,47 secondes (simulation calibrée).
530i G30 : 252 hp, ratio 6,45 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
530i G30 : 250 km/h. 320d Touring G20 : 230 km/h.