Over 0–100 km/h, 320d xDrive G20 wins (6,97 s vs 9,44 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320d xDrive G20 | 218i F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,97 s−2,47 s | 9,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,09 s−1,91 s | 17,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,84 s−2,90 s | 30,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 232 km/h+27 km/h | 205 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,11 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,68 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320d xDrive G20 | 218i F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 2,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,38 s | 3,85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 6,75 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,97 s | 9,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,84 s | 12,97 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,31 s | 24,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 34,62 s | 66,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,09 s | 17,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,84 s | 30,74 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h | 205 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d xDrive hits 100 km/h in 6.97 s versus 9.44 s for the Bmw 218i. At this point, the Bmw 320d xDrive leads by 2.47 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive is doing 119 km/h against 111 km/h for the Bmw 218i. The gap is 1.52 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d xDrive crosses the line in 15.09 s versus 16.99 s. The 1.91 s gap represents roughly 71 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 165 km/h versus 153 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive finishes in 27.84 s versus 30.73 s, with a 2.90 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 320d xDrive is capped at 233 km/h, the Bmw 218i at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.11 kg/hp vs 9.68 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.17 seconds. The 2.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320d xDrive G20 wins (6,97 s vs 9,44 s).
320d xDrive G20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,97 seconds (calibrated simulation).
320d xDrive G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp. 218i F22: 140 hp, ratio 9,68 kg/hp.
320d xDrive G20: 232 km/h. 218i F22: 205 km/h.