320d xDrive
190 hp, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 80 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive ranks 14th of 80 in Combined consumption, 48th of 72 in Tank range, 44th of 80 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.9s
VMax 233 km/h
Cons.
4.8L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 320d xDrive
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4,8 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,9 s |
| VMax | 233 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm |
| Boot | 480 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,540 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 125 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 80 saloons, the 320d xDrive ranks (top 14 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 14th of 80 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.8 L/100 L/100 (14th of 80 in Combined consumption)
The 320d xDrive consumes 4.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 833 km (48th of 72 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 320d xDrive covers 833 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 320d xDrive stands against saloons
Comparison across 80 saloons marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption
14eout of 80
Tank range
48eout of 72
0–100 km/h
44eout of 80
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A4 40 TDI
190 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A5 Sedan
204 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A5 Sedan TDI quattro S tronic 150 kW
204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
A5 Avant
204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Compare
Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive
Take the next step
Find a 320d xDrive or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 320d xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 80 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d xDrive ranks 14th of 80 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 48th of 72 in Tank range (833 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 44th of 80 in 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition Coupe).
833 km on a full tank (4.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 48th of 72 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.