Sur 0–100 km/h, i4 M50 xDrive G26 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,87 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i4 M50 xDrive G26 | S 580 e 4MATIC W223 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s−0,95 s | 4,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,01 s−0,95 s | 12,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s−1,14 s | 23,11 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 225 km/h | 250 km/h−25 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,07 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,84 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i4 M50 xDrive G26 | S 580 e 4MATIC W223 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,04 s | 3,58 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s | 4,87 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,04 s | 6,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,35 s | 10,27 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,16 s | 15,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,01 s | 12,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 23,11 s |
| Top speed limited | 225 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 795 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 215 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.87 s for the S 580 e 4MATIC. At this point, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive leads by 0.95 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive is doing 155 km/h against 144 km/h for the S 580 e 4MATIC. The gap is 0.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive crosses the line in 12.01 s versus 12.95 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 47 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 206 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive finishes in 21.97 s versus 23.10 s, with a 1.14 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), the S 580 e 4MATIC never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive is capped at 225 km/h, the S 580 e 4MATIC at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.07 kg/hp vs 4.84 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.15 seconds. The 0.95 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, i4 M50 xDrive G26 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,87 s).
i4 M50 xDrive G26 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
i4 M50 xDrive G26 : 544 hp, ratio 4,07 kg/hp. S 580 e 4MATIC W223 : 510 hp, ratio 4,84 kg/hp.
i4 M50 xDrive G26 : 225 km/h. S 580 e 4MATIC W223 : 250 km/h.