Among the 8 saloons electric 2022–2026, the i4 M50 xDrive ranks 5th of 7 in WLTP range (510 km, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD), DC charge power (205 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD).
i4 M50 xDrive
544 hp, 510 km range, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 8 saloons electric 2022–2026, the i4 M50 xDrive ranks 5th of 7 in WLTP range, DC charge power, 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
544hp
795 Nm · 544 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
3.9s
VMax 225 km/h
Range
510km
WLTP
DC charging
205kW
Full specifications BMW i4 M50 xDrive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 544 hp |
| Combined power | 544 hp |
| Couple | 795 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 80.7 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 510 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 205 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 19.7 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,9 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,783 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,856 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,215 kg |
| Cd | 0.24 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 8 saloons electric, the i4 M50 xDrive ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD (1st with 800 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 510 km WLTP (5th of 7 in WLTP range)
The i4 M50 xDrive offers 510 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD (800 km).
Charging: 205 kW DC (DC charge power)
The i4 M50 xDrive accepts up to 205 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (250 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the i4 M50 xDrive stands against saloons electric
Comparison across 8 saloons electric marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW i4 G26 range
Generation G26 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G26
Popular duels involving the i4 M50 xDrive
BMW i4 M50 xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
510 km WLTP announced — making it the 5th of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD (800 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD leads in WLTP range (800 km vs 510 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i4 M50 xDrive vs Xiaomi SU7 Max AWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.