Over 0–100 km/h, 230i Convertible F22 wins (5,86 s vs 6,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | 230i Convertible F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 5,86 s+0,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,21 s+0,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−0,14 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 250 km/h−57 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hp | 6,25 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | 230i Convertible F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 4,18 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 5,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 8,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 14,44 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 24,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,21 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 26,01 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 193 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 230i Convertible hits 100 km/h in 5.86 s versus 6.12 s for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. Despite lacking instant torque, 252 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw 230i Convertible leads by 0.26 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 230i Convertible is doing 129 km/h against 135 km/h for the Bmw i5 eDrive40. The gap is 0.31 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 230i Convertible crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.29 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw i5 eDrive40 maxes out at 193 km/h while the Bmw 230i Convertible keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.09 s.
Around 494 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 57 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 26.01 s. The 0.14 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the Bmw 230i Convertible at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.32 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 230i Convertible F22 wins (5,86 s vs 6,12 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. 230i Convertible F22: 252 hp, ratio 6,25 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. 230i Convertible F22: 250 km/h.