Over 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 wins (4,12 s vs 4,66 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i7 xDrive60 G70 | M2 G87 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,12 s+0,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,86 s | 12,08 s+0,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,17 s | 21,81 s+1,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h | 285 km/h−45 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,85 kg/hp | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i7 xDrive60 G70 | M2 G87 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,17 s | 1,95 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,51 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,09 s | 5,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,15 s | 8,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,03 s | 13,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,86 s | 12,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,17 s | 21,81 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 285 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 745 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
Off the line, the M2 hits 100 km/h in 4.12 s versus 4.66 s for the Bmw i7 xDrive60. Despite lacking instant torque, 460 hp of power compensates. At this point, the M2 leads by 0.54 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M2 is doing 155 km/h against 145 km/h for the Bmw i7 xDrive60. The gap is 0.49 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the M2 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.86 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M2 finishes in 21.80 s versus 23.17 s, with a 1.37 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i7 xDrive60 is capped at 240 km/h, the M2 at 285 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.94 seconds. The 0.54 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 wins (4,12 s vs 4,66 s).
i7 xDrive60 G70 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,66 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i7 xDrive60 G70: 544 hp, ratio 4,85 kg/hp. M2 G87: 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
i7 xDrive60 G70: 240 km/h. M2 G87: 285 km/h.