BMW i7 xDrive60
544 hp, 625 km range, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 3 limousines electric 2020–2024, the i7 xDrive60 ranks WLTP range, DC charge power, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 544 hp
- 745 Nm, dont 258 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.7 s
- VMax 240 km/h
- Range
- 625 km
- WLTP
- DC charging
- 195 kW
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Electric power
- 258 hp
- Combined power
- 544 hp
- Couple
- 745 Nm
- Gearbox
- Mono-rapport Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Battery and charging
- Battery capacity
- 101.7 kWh
- Range WLTP
- 625 km
- Charge AC max
- 11 kW
- Charge DC max
- 195 kW
- EV cons. WLTP
- 16.3 kWh/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,7 s
- VMax
- 240 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,391 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,215 mm
- Width
- 1,950 mm
- Height
- 1,544 mm
- Boot
- 500 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,640 kg
- Cd
- 0.24
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 3 limousines electric, the i7 xDrive60 ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes EQS 450 (1st with 695 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Mercedes EQS 450 (1st with 200 kW) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 625 km WLTP (WLTP range)
The i7 xDrive60 offers 625 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (695 km).
Charging: 195 kW DC (DC charge power)
The i7 xDrive60 accepts up to 195 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (200 kW).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceReal-world range
Simulate range by speed, temperature and driving style.
Simulate rangeWhere the i7 xDrive60 stands against limousines electric
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW i7 G70 range
Generation G70 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G70
Popular duels involving the i7 xDrive60
Continue with the BMW i7 xDrive60
The same car, from other angles.
BMW i7 xDrive60: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the i7 xDrive60 rank in its segment?
Among the 3 limousines electric 2020–2024, the i7 xDrive60 ranks WLTP range (625 km, behind the Mercedes EQS 450), DC charge power (195 kW, behind the Mercedes EQS 450), 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the BMW i7 M70 xDrive).
What is the WLTP range of the i7 xDrive60?
625 km WLTP announced - making it the WLTP range out of 3 models. The reference is the Mercedes EQS 450 (695 km).
How much does the i7 xDrive60 cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Mercedes EQS 450 instead?
The Mercedes EQS 450 leads in WLTP range (695 km vs 625 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i7 xDrive60 vs Mercedes EQS 450 duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.