Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 5,16 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | 745e G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−1,45 s | 5,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−1,43 s | 13,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−2,23 s | 24,08 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,08 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | 745e G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 3,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 5,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 6,84 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | 18,09 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 13,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 24,08 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 5.16 s for the Bmw 745e. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 1.45 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 139 km/h for the Bmw 745e. The gap is 1.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 13.37 s. The 1.43 s gap represents roughly 67 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 24.07 s, with a 2.23 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
The iX M60 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Bmw 745e’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the iX M60 and the Bmw 745e are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 5.08 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.80 seconds. The 1.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 5,16 s).
iX M60 I20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,71 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX M60 I20 : 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. 745e G11 : 394 hp, ratio 5,08 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20 : 250 km/h. 745e G11 : 250 km/h.