Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 5,98 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−2,27 s | 5,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−2,33 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−4,56 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,23 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 4,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 5,98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 8,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 15,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | 28,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 5.98 s for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 2.27 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 127 km/h for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 1.48 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 14.27 s. The 2.33 s gap represents roughly 97 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 26.41 s, with a 4.56 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the iX M60 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 2.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 5,98 s).
iX M60 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20: 250 km/h. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.