Over 0–100 km/h, M240i Convertible F44 wins (4,66 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M240i Convertible F44 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,66 s−2,41 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,85 s−2,26 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s−4,77 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M240i Convertible F44 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,22 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,46 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,66 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,12 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,15 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,41 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,85 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 660 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the M240i Convertible hits 100 km/h in 4.66 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the M240i Convertible leads by 2.41 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M240i Convertible is doing 145 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.20 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M240i Convertible crosses the line in 12.85 s versus 15.11 s. The 2.26 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M240i Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 201 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M240i Convertible finishes in 23.31 s versus 28.09 s, with a 4.77 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M240i Convertible is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.88 kg/hp vs 9.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 2.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M240i Convertible F44 wins (4,66 s vs 7,07 s).
M240i Convertible F44 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,66 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M240i Convertible F44: 340 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
M240i Convertible F44: 250 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.