Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 5,98 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M3 Competition F80 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−2,10 s | 5,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,65 s−2,62 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,92 s−5,49 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,39 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,23 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M3 Competition F80 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,01 s | 4,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 5,98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,84 s | 8,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,51 s | 15,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 28,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,65 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,92 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw M3 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 5.98 s for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. Despite lacking instant torque, 510 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw M3 Competition leads by 2.10 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 127 km/h for the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 1.46 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M3 Competition crosses the line in 11.64 s versus 14.27 s. The 2.62 s gap represents roughly 109 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition finishes in 20.91 s versus 26.41 s, with a 5.49 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M3 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 2.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 5,98 s).
M3 Competition F80 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M3 Competition F80: 510 hp, ratio 3,39 kg/hp. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
M3 Competition F80: 250 km/h. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.