Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 gagne (4,19 s vs 4,64 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | S3 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s−0,45 s | 4,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s−0,86 s | 13,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s−1,86 s | 23,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,61 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | S3 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,23 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,05 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 3,41 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 4,64 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 6,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 10,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 17,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 13,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 23,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 4.64 s for the S3 Sportback. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 139 km/h for the S3 Sportback. The gap is 0.43 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 13.08 s. The 0.86 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 23.72 s, with a 1.86 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 and the S3 Sportback are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 4.61 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.65 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 gagne (4,19 s vs 4,64 s).
M4 G82 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,19 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M4 G82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. S3 Sportback : 333 hp, ratio 4,61 kg/hp.
M4 G82 : 250 km/h. S3 Sportback : 250 km/h.