Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 4,43 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | M4 Competition Convertible F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s−0,24 s | 4,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s−0,28 s | 12,51 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s−0,69 s | 22,55 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,98 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | M4 Competition Convertible F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,16 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 1,94 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 3,25 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 4,43 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 5,80 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 9,41 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 14,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 12,51 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 22,55 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 790 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 4.43 s for the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible is 1 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 148 km/h for the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible. The gap is 0.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 12.51 s. The 0.28 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 209 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 22.55 s, with a 0.70 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 and the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 3.98 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.52 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 4,43 s).
M4 G82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 G82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. M4 Competition Convertible F82: 450 hp, ratio 3,98 kg/hp.
M4 G82: 250 km/h. M4 Competition Convertible F82: 250 km/h.