Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 3,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE R P575 | M4 Competition F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s−0,09 s | 3,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s−0,09 s | 11,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s−0,19 s | 20,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 300 km/h+50 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,38 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE R P575 | M4 Competition F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,10 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,88 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,99 s | 2,97 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s | 3,83 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,75 s | 4,79 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,30 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,00 s | 11,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s | 11,61 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s | 20,89 s |
| Top speed limited | 300 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-TYPE R P575 2020 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 Competition | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
Off the line, the F-TYPE R P575 hits 100 km/h in 3.74 s versus 3.83 s for the Bmw M4 Competition. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 is doing 165 km/h against 163 km/h for the Bmw M4 Competition. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE R P575 crosses the line in 11.52 s versus 11.61 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 230 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 finishes in 20.70 s versus 20.89 s, with a 0.19 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE R P575 is capped at 300 km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.03 kg/hp vs 3.38 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.36 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 3,83 s).
F-TYPE R P575 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,74 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-TYPE R P575 : 575 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp. M4 Competition F82 : 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp.
F-TYPE R P575 : 300 km/h. M4 Competition F82 : 250 km/h.