Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 gagne (3,83 s vs 5,81 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition F82 | TT 45 TFSI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−1,98 s | 5,81 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s−2,46 s | 14,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s−4,60 s | 25,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 251 km/h−1 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,43 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition F82 | TT 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,56 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,60 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 4,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 5,81 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,79 s | 7,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,46 s | 13,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 22,61 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s | 14,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s | 25,49 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 251 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 Competition | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 330 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 5.81 s for the TT 45 TFSI. At this point, the Bmw M4 Competition leads by 1.98 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 133 km/h for the TT 45 TFSI. The gap is 1.55 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Competition crosses the line in 11.61 s versus 14.06 s. The 2.46 s gap represents roughly 108 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition finishes in 20.89 s versus 25.49 s, with a 4.60 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 251 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.38 kg/hp vs 5.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.89 seconds. The 1.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 gagne (3,83 s vs 5,81 s).
M4 Competition F82 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M4 Competition F82 : 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp. TT 45 TFSI : 245 hp, ratio 5,43 kg/hp.
M4 Competition F82 : 250 km/h. TT 45 TFSI : 251 km/h.