Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition Convertible F82 wins (4,43 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition Convertible F82 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s−2,64 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,51 s−2,60 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,55 s−5,54 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,98 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition Convertible F82 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,94 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,25 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,80 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,41 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,54 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,51 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,55 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 790 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible hits 100 km/h in 4.43 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible leads by 2.64 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible is doing 148 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible crosses the line in 12.51 s versus 15.11 s. The 2.60 s gap represents roughly 100 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible finishes in 22.55 s versus 28.09 s, with a 5.54 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M4 Competition Convertible is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.98 kg/hp vs 9.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 2.64 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition Convertible F82 wins (4,43 s vs 7,07 s).
M4 Competition Convertible F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,43 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Competition Convertible F82: 450 hp, ratio 3,98 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
M4 Competition Convertible F82: 250 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.