Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Coupe F82 wins (4,38 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Coupe F82 | X5 M50d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,38 s−0,78 s | 5,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,21 s−1,26 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s−2,85 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,64 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Coupe F82 | X5 M50d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,17 s | 2,15 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,43 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,38 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,49 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,40 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,64 s | 20,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,21 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Coupe hits 100 km/h in 4.38 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. At this point, the Bmw M4 Coupe leads by 0.78 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Coupe is doing 157 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw X5 M50d. The gap is 0.61 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Coupe crosses the line in 12.21 s versus 13.47 s. The 1.26 s gap represents roughly 58 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Coupe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 221 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Coupe finishes in 21.75 s versus 24.60 s, with a 2.85 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 Coupe and the Bmw X5 M50d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.64 kg/hp vs 5.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 0.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Coupe F82 wins (4,38 s vs 5,15 s).
M4 Coupe F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,38 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Coupe F82: 431 hp, ratio 3,64 kg/hp. X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp.
M4 Coupe F82: 250 km/h. X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h.