Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 4,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 F90 | S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion W223 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s−1,03 s | 4,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s−1,34 s | 12,59 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s−2,26 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,89 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 F90 | S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion W223 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,04 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,56 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,38 s | 5,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,00 s | 9,77 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,73 s | 15,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s | 12,59 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 195 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.43 s versus 4.45 s for the S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion. At this point, the M5 leads by 1.03 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M5 is doing 165 km/h against 145 km/h for the S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion. The gap is 0.82 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M5 crosses the line in 11.25 s versus 12.59 s. The 1.34 s gap represents roughly 66 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 207 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M5 finishes in 20.43 s versus 22.69 s, with a 2.26 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the M5 and the S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 4.89 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.84 seconds. The 1.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 4,45 s).
M5 F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 F90: 600 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion W223: 449 hp, ratio 4,89 kg/hp.
M5 F90: 250 km/h. S 500 4MATIC Limousine Langversion W223: 250 km/h.