Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 gagne (3,03 s vs 6,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 CS F90 | Cayenne S Hybrid 958.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,03 s−3,19 s | 6,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,82 s−3,55 s | 14,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,94 s−6,45 s | 26,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 295 km/h+59 km/h | 236 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,87 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,89 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 CS F90 | Cayenne S Hybrid 958.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,91 s | 1,35 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,51 s | 2,26 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,28 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,03 s | 6,22 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,74 s | 8,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,21 s | 14,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,97 s | 27,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,82 s | 14,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,94 s | 26,39 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h | 236 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 825 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 578 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 239 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 CS hits 100 km/h in 3.03 s versus 6.22 s for the Cayenne S Hybrid. At this point, the Bmw M5 CS leads by 3.19 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 CS is doing 170 km/h against 127 km/h for the Cayenne S Hybrid. The gap is 2.29 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 CS crosses the line in 10.81 s versus 14.37 s. The 3.55 s gap represents roughly 145 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 CS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 CS finishes in 19.94 s versus 26.38 s, with a 6.44 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M5 CS is capped at 305 km/h, the Cayenne S Hybrid at 242 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.87 kg/hp vs 5.89 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.71 seconds. The 3.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 gagne (3,03 s vs 6,22 s).
M5 CS F90 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,03 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M5 CS F90 : 635 hp, ratio 2,87 kg/hp. Cayenne S Hybrid 958.1 : 380 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp.
M5 CS F90 : 295 km/h. Cayenne S Hybrid 958.1 : 236 km/h.