Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 7,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 | X1 xDrive25e F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,65 s | 6,84 s+0,81 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,68 s | 14,99 s+0,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,25 s | 27,59 s+0,66 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h+40 km/h | 193 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,22 kg/hp | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 | X1 xDrive25e F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,01 s | 1,45 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,35 s | 2,49 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,58 s | 4,75 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,65 s | 6,84 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,33 s | 9,57 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,22 s | 17,61 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,56 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,68 s | 14,99 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,25 s | 27,59 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 193 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 850 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic (EAT8) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e hits 100 km/h in 6.84 s versus 7.65 s for the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8. At this point, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e leads by 0.81 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e is doing 121 km/h against 120 km/h for the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8. The gap is 0.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e crosses the line in 14.99 s versus 15.68 s. The 0.69 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 167 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e finishes in 27.59 s versus 28.25 s, with a 0.66 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (233 km/h), the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 never recovers its launch deficit.
The Bmw X1 xDrive25e features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 193 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.22 kg/hp vs 7.93 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 0.81 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 7,65 s).
3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,65 secondes (simulation calibrée).
3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 : 225 hp, ratio 8,22 kg/hp. X1 xDrive25e F48 : 220 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp.
3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 : 233 km/h. X1 xDrive25e F48 : 193 km/h.