Performance duelHome › Duel

Peugeot 508 THP 160 EAT6 vs Bmw X2 xDrive18d F39 : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

VMax
Bmw X2 xDrive18d0-100
76
0 – 100 km/h
9.59s
0.28 s
X2
9.31s
400 m standing start
17.18s
0.48 s
X2
16.70s
Top speed
226
21 km/h
508
205
Power163 ch
Power150 ch
Torque240 Nm
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 415 kg
Weight1 580 kg
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
GearboxAutomatic · EAT6 6…
GearboxManual · 6 sp.
VMax
Peugeot
508 THP 160 EAT6
2014
9,59 s
226 km/h
Power163 ch
Torque240 Nm
Weight1 415 kg
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
Faster
Bmw X2 xDrive18d
BMW
X2 xDrive18d F39
2018
9,31 s
205 km/h
Power150 ch
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 580 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
Peugeot 508 THP 160 EAT6
2014 · PETROL · 163 ch
Bmw X2 xDrive18d
2018 · DIESEL · 150 ch
0-30 km/h2,77 s
0-50 km/h4,63 s
0-80 km/h7,34 s
0-100 km/h9,59 s
0-120 km/h12,45 s
0-160 km/h21,10 s
0-200 km/h39,22 s
400 m DA17,18 s
1 000 m DA30,12 s
VMax226 km/h
0-30 km/h1,29 s
0-50 km/h2,94 s
0-80 km/h6,38 s
0-100 km/h9,31 s
0-120 km/h13,59 s
0-160 km/h27,38 s
0-200 km/h73,57 s
400 m DA16,70 s
1 000 m DA30,97 s
VMax205 km/h
DQM94%
508 THP 160 EAT6
--
X2 xDrive18d
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 94%
400 m result
16.70s
Bmw X2 xDrive18d
Gap
0.48s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
508 THP
Gap
Bmw X2
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
8.14 s
88 km/h
~27 m
6 long.
6.96 s
85 km/h
200 m
11.67 s
115 km/h
~30 m
6½ long.
10.70 s
106 km/h
400 m
17.18 s
145 km/h
~19 m
4 long.
16.70 s
133 km/h
600 m
21.85 s
163 km/h
~1 m
21.83 s
148 km/h
1,000 m
30.11 s
185 km/h
~40 m
8½ long.
30.97 s
167 km/h

At 400 m, Bmw X2 xDrive18d leads by 0.48 s. At 1 000 m, Peugeot 508 THP 160 EAT6 takes the lead by 0.85 s.

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 94 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



508 THP 160 EAT6 vs Bmw X2 xDrive18d: chronicle of a drag race at 226 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Bmw X2 xDrive18d hits 100 km/h in 9.31 s versus 9.59 s for the 508 THP 160 EAT6. At this point, the Bmw X2 xDrive18d leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Bmw X2 xDrive18d is doing 106 km/h against 115 km/h for the 508 THP 160 EAT6. The gap is 0.97 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X2 xDrive18d crosses the line in 16.70 s versus 17.18 s. The 0.48 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track — two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw X2 xDrive18d maxes out at 205 km/h while the 508 THP 160 EAT6 keeps accelerating towards 226 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.02 s.

Around 609 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the 508 THP 160 EAT6 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 21 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the 508 THP 160 EAT6 finishes in 30.11 s versus 30.97 s. The 0.86 s delta in favour of the 508 THP 160 EAT6 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 206 km/h, the Bmw X2 xDrive18d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.68 kg/hp vs 10.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.02 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Bmw X2 xDrive18d has a clear edge over the Peugeot 508 THP 160 EAT6 to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.