F39 · GENERATION 2018 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X2 xDrive18d

150 hp, 9,2 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X2 xDrive18d ranks 10th of 30 in Combined consumption, 10th of 26 in Tank range, 18th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,70815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

150hp

350 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.2s

VMax 206 km/h

Cons.

5.2L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X2 xDrive18d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Power150 hp
Couple350 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.2 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,2 s
VMax206 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,360 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,824 mm
Height1,526 mm
Boot470 L
Kerb weight1,580 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP137 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 30 C-SUV, the X2 xDrive18d ranks (top 10 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 10th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.2 L/100 L/100 (10th of 30 in Combined consumption)

The X2 xDrive18d consumes 5.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 981 km (10th of 26 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X2 xDrive18d covers 981 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X2 xDrive18d stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 30 C-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption10e / 30
5.2 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
Tank range10e / 26
981 km
Min 765 km · Kia Sportage 1.6 T-GDi 177 4WDMax 1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
0–100 km/h18e / 30
9,2 s
Min 11,8 s · Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 XtronicMax 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X2 F39 range

Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F39

Compare

Popular duels involving the X2 xDrive18d

Frequently asked questions

BMW X2 xDrive18d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X2 xDrive18d ranks 10th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 10th of 26 in Tank range (981 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 18th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).

981 km on a full tank (5.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 10th of 26 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 xDrive18d vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.