Over 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 wins (7,84 s vs 8,23 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | X2 xDrive20i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 7,84 s+0,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,73 s+0,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 28,75 s+0,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 221 km/h−41 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hp | 8,02 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | X2 xDrive20i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,66 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 2,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 5,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 7,84 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 10,89 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 19,94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 40,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 28,75 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 221 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X2 xDrive20i hits 100 km/h in 7.84 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the X2 xDrive20i leads by 0.39 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X2 xDrive20i is doing 116 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 0.30 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the X2 xDrive20i crosses the line in 15.73 s versus 16.10 s. The 0.37 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the X2 xDrive20i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X2 xDrive20i finishes in 28.74 s versus 29.39 s, with a 0.64 s lead.
The X2 xDrive20i features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the XC40 B4’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the X2 xDrive20i at 224 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 8.02 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 wins (7,84 s vs 8,23 s).
XC40 B4 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,23 seconds (calibrated simulation).
XC40 B4: 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. X2 xDrive20i F39: 192 hp, ratio 8,02 kg/hp.
XC40 B4: 180 km/h. X2 xDrive20i F39: 221 km/h.