See the simulation above.
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Donnée constructeur en cours de validation pour ce profil
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 335 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 855 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
See the simulation above.
X2 xDrive25e F39 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,92 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X2 xDrive25e F39: 220 hp, ratio 7,86 kg/hp. CR-V e:PHEV: 181 hp, ratio 10,25 kg/hp.
X2 xDrive25e F39: 195 km/h. CR-V e:PHEV: 180 km/h.