Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X2 xDrive25e ranks 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range (57 km, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV), 7th of 9 in Combined range (608 km, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 7th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated (6.5 L/100, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 5th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (6.8 s, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV).
X2 xDrive25e
220 hp, 57 km electric range, 6,8 s 0-100 : among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X2 xDrive25e ranks 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, 7th of 9 in Combined range, 7th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated, 5th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
220hp
385 Nm · 95 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.8s
VMax 195 km/h
Total range
608km
of which 57 km elec
Battery + Tank
8.8kWh
+ 36 L tank
Full specifications BMW X2 xDrive25e
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 95 hp |
| Combined power | 220 hp |
| Couple | 385 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 8.8 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 57 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 100.0 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 1.9 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 6.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 36 L |
| EV range motorway | 7 km |
| Total range motorway | 608 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,8 s |
| VMax | 195 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,360 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,824 mm |
| Height | 1,512 mm |
| Boot | 410 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,730 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 43 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid, the X2 xDrive25e combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (mid-table), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the X2 xDrive25e through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
In the city: 57 km pure electric (mid-table)
With a full battery, the X2 xDrive25e drives in pure electric mode for the first 57 km WLTP — placing it 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the X2 xDrive25e behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the X2 xDrive25e stands against C-SUV plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X2 F39 range
Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F39
Popular duels involving the X2 xDrive25e
BMW X2 xDrive25e: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
57 km WLTP announced — making it the 5th of 9 in autonomie du segment out of 9 models. The reference is the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Toyota RAV4 PHEV leads in Electric WLTP range (75 km vs 57 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 xDrive25e vs Toyota RAV4 PHEV duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.