F39 · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT SUV
BMWPHEV

X2 xDrive25e

220 hp, 57 km electric range, 6,8 s 0-100 : among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X2 xDrive25e ranks 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, 7th of 9 in Combined range, 7th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated, 5th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power

220hp

385 Nm · 95 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.8s

VMax 195 km/h

Total range

608km

of which 57 km elec

Battery + Tank

8.8kWh

+ 36 L tank

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X2 xDrive25e

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture3 cyl.
Displacement1,499 cm³
Puissance électrique95 hp
Combined power220 hp
Couple385 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity8.8 kWh
Range WLTP57 km
Conso élec WLTP100.0 kWh/100km
Petrol cons. WLTP1.9 L/100km
Conso thermique6.5 L/100km
Tank36 L
EV range motorway7 km
Total range motorway608 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,8 s
VMax195 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,360 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,824 mm
Height1,512 mm
Boot410 L
Kerb weight1,730 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP43 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid, the X2 xDrive25e combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (mid-table), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the X2 xDrive25e through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

In the city: 57 km pure electric (mid-table)

With a full battery, the X2 xDrive25e drives in pure electric mode for the first 57 km WLTP — placing it 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the X2 xDrive25e behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.

Segment positioning

Where the X2 xDrive25e stands against C-SUV plug-in hybrid

Comparison across 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.

Electric WLTP range5e / 9
57 km
Min 49 km · Bmw X1 xDrive25eMax 75 km · Toyota RAV4 PHEV
Combined range7e / 9
608 km
Min 59 km · Opel Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWDMax 1 013 km · Ford Kuga PHEV 225
Thermal cons. estimated7e / 9
6.53 L/100
Min 7.56 L/100 · Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEVMax 4.7 L/100 · Ford Kuga PHEV 225
0–100 km/h5e / 9
6,8 s
Min 9,2 s · Ford Kuga PHEV 225Max 6,0 s · Toyota RAV4 PHEV

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X2 F39 range

Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F39

Compare

Popular duels involving the X2 xDrive25e

Frequently asked questions

BMW X2 xDrive25e: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X2 xDrive25e ranks 5th of 9 in Electric WLTP range (57 km, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV), 7th of 9 in Combined range (608 km, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 7th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated (6.5 L/100, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 5th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (6.8 s, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV).

57 km WLTP announced — making it the 5th of 9 in autonomie du segment out of 9 models. The reference is the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Toyota RAV4 PHEV leads in Electric WLTP range (75 km vs 57 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 xDrive25e vs Toyota RAV4 PHEV duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.