Sur 0–100 km/h, Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG gagne (7,56 s vs 7,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 xDrive20d G01 | Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,92 s | 7,56 s+0,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,77 s | 15,63 s+0,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,23 s | 28,75 s+0,48 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 213 km/h | 218 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,66 kg/hp | 9,05 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 xDrive20d G01 | Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,55 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,59 s | 2,71 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,31 s | 5,33 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,92 s | 7,56 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,33 s | 11,01 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,92 s | 19,93 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 50,34 s | 41,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,77 s | 15,63 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,23 s | 28,75 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h | 218 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 835 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 720 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG (DQ381) |
Off the line, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG hits 100 km/h in 7.56 s versus 7.92 s for the Bmw X3 xDrive20d. The 0.36 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG is doing 115 km/h against 114 km/h for the Bmw X3 xDrive20d. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG crosses the line in 15.63 s versus 15.76 s. The 0.14 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 161 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG finishes in 28.75 s versus 29.22 s, with a 0.48 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (213 vs 218 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 213 km/h, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.66 kg/hp vs 9.05 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.36 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG gagne (7,56 s vs 7,92 s).
X3 xDrive20d G01 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X3 xDrive20d G01 : 190 hp, ratio 9,66 kg/hp. Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG : 190 hp, ratio 9,05 kg/hp.
X3 xDrive20d G01 : 213 km/h. Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG : 218 km/h.