G01 · GENERATION 2020 · FAMILY SUV
BMWMHEV

X3 xDrive20d

190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 8 D-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X3 xDrive20d ranks 2nd of 8 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 6 in Tank range, 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,67515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

7.9s

VMax 213 km/h

Cons.

5.1L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X3 xDrive20d

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.1 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,9 s
VMax213 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,708 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,891 mm
Height1,676 mm
Boot550 L
Kerb weight1,835 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP134 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 8 D-SUV hybrid, the X3 xDrive20d ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 8 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 2nd of 6 in Tank range (1333 km).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d (1st with 1333 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 8 in Combined consumption)

The X3 xDrive20d consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X4 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 1333 km (2nd of 6 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X3 xDrive20d covers 1333 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X3 xDrive20d stands against D-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 8 D-SUV hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption2e / 8
5.1 L/100
Min 7.5 L/100 · Volvo XC60 B5 AWD GeartronicMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X4 xDrive20d
Tank range2e / 6
1 333 km
Min 1 133 km · Bmw X3 M40dMax 1 333 km · Bmw X4 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h7e / 8
7,9 s
Min 9,2 s · Lexus NX 300h AWDMax 4,9 s · Bmw X4 M40d

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X3 G01 range

Generation G01 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G01

Compare

Popular duels involving the X3 xDrive20d

Frequently asked questions

BMW X3 xDrive20d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 8 D-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X3 xDrive20d ranks 2nd of 8 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 2nd of 6 in Tank range (1333 km, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw X4 M40d).

1333 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 2nd of 6 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X4 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X3 xDrive20d vs Bmw X4 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.