Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG
190 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 41 D-SUV 2018–2022, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG ranks 16th of 41 in Combined consumption, 7th of 38 in Tank range, 29th of 41 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.5s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
6.1L
/100 km
Tank
73L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,968 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,1 L/100km |
| Tank | 73 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,5 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,720 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 160 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 41 D-SUV, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
D-SUV among the best in segment: 7th of 38 in Tank range (1197 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 1333 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.1 L/100 L/100 (16th of 41 in Combined consumption)
The Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG consumes 6.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 1197 km (7th of 38 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG covers 1197 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 41 D-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption
16eout of 41
Tank range
7eout of 38
0–100 km/h
29eout of 41
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 xDrive20d
190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
X4 xDrive20d
190 hp · 0-100 8.0 s
X3 xDrive20d
190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
X4 xDrive20d
190 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG
Take the next step
Find a Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 41 D-SUV 2018–2022, the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG ranks 16th of 41 in Combined consumption (6.1 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 7th of 38 in Tank range (1197 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 29th of 41 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
1197 km on a full tank (6.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 7th of 38 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.