Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 7,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 xDrive30i G01 | Q5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s−1,00 s | 7,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s−0,72 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s−2,05 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+14 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 xDrive30i G01 | Q5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,50 s | 1,12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,54 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,56 s | 4,81 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s | 7,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,65 s | 10,60 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,25 s | 21,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,16 s | 40,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 955 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the X3 xDrive30i hits 100 km/h in 6.35 s versus 7.35 s for the Q5 SUV. Despite the faster sprint time, the Q5 SUV is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the X3 xDrive30i is doing 126 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q5 SUV. The gap is 0.21 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 xDrive30i crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 15.29 s. The 0.72 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the X3 xDrive30i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 xDrive30i finishes in 26.56 s versus 28.61 s, with a 2.05 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (240 vs 226 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X3 xDrive30i is capped at 240 km/h, the Q5 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 9.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.47 seconds. The 1.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 7,35 s).
X3 xDrive30i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 xDrive30i G01: 252 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. Q5 SUV: 204 hp, ratio 9,58 kg/hp.
X3 xDrive30i G01: 240 km/h. Q5 SUV: 226 km/h.