Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,94 s vs 5,28 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan S 95B.1 | X4 M40d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 4,94 s+0,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s | 13,29 s+0,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 24,39 s+0,21 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h+1 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,49 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan S 95B.1 | X4 M40d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,25 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,30 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,87 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,01 s | 6,72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,88 s | 11,71 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,13 s | 19,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s | 13,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 24,39 s |
| Top speed limited | 251 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 5.28 s for the Macan S. At this point, the Bmw X4 M40d leads by 0.34 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d is doing 137 km/h against 138 km/h for the Macan S. The gap is 0.24 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M40d crosses the line in 13.29 s versus 13.52 s. The 0.23 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d finishes in 24.38 s versus 24.59 s, with a 0.21 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (251 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Macan S and the Bmw X4 M40d are governed to 251 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.49 kg/hp vs 5.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.00 seconds. The 0.34 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,94 s vs 5,28 s).
Macan S 95B.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,28 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan S 95B.1 : 340 hp, ratio 5,49 kg/hp. X4 M40d G02 : 326 hp, ratio 5,81 kg/hp.
Macan S 95B.1 : 251 km/h. X4 M40d G02 : 250 km/h.